Talus Fractures: A Current Concepts Review of Diagnoses, Treatments, and Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The talus is the key articular segment linking the leg and foot, and as such, is subject to complex loads and may occasionally fracture. Fracture patterns provide clues to the underlying pathomechanics and energy of the injury, both of which can help guide treatment and suggest prognosis. Talus fractures have a wide variety of presentation from low-energy avulsion fractures of the lateral or posterior processes, to high-energy comminuted talar body fractures. Appropriate, expedient treatment provides the patient the best chance of obtaining a good functional outcome. Treatment relies on appropriate diagnosis, which hinges on clinical suspicion provided by the patient's account of pathomechanics, clinical examination, and radiological workup. This current concepts review discusses the pathomechanics, presentation, workup, treatment, and prognosis of fractures of the talar head, neck, body, lateral process, posterior process, and talar extrusions. Key words: talus, fracture, talar neck, talar head, talar body, lateral process, posterior process, talar extrusion, orthopaedic surgery, review.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".