Limitation of lower limbV˙<scp>o</scp><sub>2</sub>during cycling exercise in COPD patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) usually stop exercise before reaching physiological limits in terms of O(2) delivery and extraction. A plateau in lower limb O(2) uptake (VO(2)) and blood flow occurs despite progression of the imposed workload during cycling in some patients with COPD, suggesting that maximal capacity to transport O(2) had been reached and that it had been extracted in the peripheral exercising muscles. This study addresses this observation. Symptom-limited incremental cycle exercise was performed by 14 men [62 +/- 11 (SD) yr] with severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 35 +/- 7% of predicted value). Leg blood flow was measured at each exercise step with a thermodilution catheter inserted in the femoral vein. This value was multiplied by two to account for both working legs (Q(LEGS)). Arterial and femoral venous blood was sampled at each exercise step to measure blood gases. Leg O(2) consumption (VO(2LEGS)) was calculated according to the Fick equation. Total body VO(2) (VO(2TOT)) was measured from expired gas analysis, and tidal volume (VT) and minute ventilation (VE) were derived from the flow signal. In eight patients, VO(2LEGS) kept increasing in parallel with VO(2TOT) as external work rate was increasing. In six subjects, a plateau in VO(2LEGS) and Q(LEGS) occurred during exercise (increment of <3% between 2 consecutive increasing workloads) despite the increase in workload and VO(2TOT) [corresponding mean was 110 +/- 38 ml (11 +/- 4%)]. These six patients also exhibited a plateau in O(2) extraction during exercise. Peak exercise work rate was higher in the eight patients without a plateau than in the six with a plateau (51 +/- 10 vs. 40 +/- 13 W, P = 0.043). VT, VE, and dyspnea were significantly greater at submaximal exercise in patients of the plateau group compared with those of the nonplateau group. These results show that, in some patients with COPD, blood flow directed to peripheral muscles and O(2) extraction during exercise may be limited. We speculate that redistribution of cardiac output and O(2) from the lower limb exercising muscles to the ventilatory muscles is a possible mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".