[The treatment and complications of intraarticular fractures of the distal radius].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this trial was to determine the rate of complications and the cause of complications after intraarticular fractures of the distal radius. We examined those patients, who had intraarticular fractures of the distal radius and who were treated in Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital and Kaunas Red Cross hospital in 1998-2000. The evaluation of results was made by movement of the joint and pain in the wrist, which was evaluated by pain scale and McGill pain questionnaire. Palmar slope, radial inclination and radial length were evaluated rentgenologically. Distal radioulnar joint was evaluated as well (with evaluation of scapholunate ligament condition). Patients were investigated 1.5 and 2 years after fracture. RESULTS: There are more secondary dislocations and the shortening of radius in group that was treated by gypsum bandage. Good distraction of fracture ends is seen using external fixation, but strain of soft tissue gives complications: contraction of fingers, and instability of wrist. The incongruence of joint surface causes early arthrosis and pain. The injury of ligaments in the wrist, which can be seen by X-ray examination, causes instability of wrist and chronic pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".