MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2231499508

Deweyan inquiry: From education theory to practice

2012· article· en· W2231499508 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andreas Koepfer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacilitatorPragmatismPedagogySociologyEducation theoryMathematics educationTeacher educationPsychologyEpistemologyHigher educationSocial psychologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Johnston, J.S. (2009). Deweyan inquiry: From education theory to practice. Albany: Suny Press. 97 pages, ISBN: 978-0-7914-9355-7 Introduction Decades have passed since the paradigm shift in education theory regarding student-centredness altered learning and education; the aim was to have no more teacher-centered classrooms, no artificial textbook exercises, and no student passivity. The intended result of this shift was activity-based classrooms, in which students work together in groups on relevant tasks, experiment, and exchange thoughts and ideas in order to tackle problems and obstacles to gain an extensive understanding of the matter. In this model, the teacher accompanies students as a facilitator. Today, however, peeping into classrooms, one has to admit that--for whatever reasons--the textbooks have somehow found a way to prevail. One can still hear the teacher speak for most of the time, and relevant tasks and projects are initiated scarcely. James Scott Johnston tries to contribute to the understanding of this divide between education theory and practice by having a closer look into Dewey's comprehensive work. He puts his focus of attention onto the so-called and takes a closer look at the most important terms of Dewey's theory of education and pragmatism. He clearly states, however, that his work is not intended to substitute Dewey's work, but that his overall aim is to point out how can be of use in several fields of education, such as science education, social science education, art and art education, and embodiment and physical education. Johnston starts off with a general introduction into the idea of inquiry, the specific context in which inquiry can take place and what the methods and techniques of inquiry look like. The reader gets to know the ideas behind various terms--such as situation, self-correction, and universal conception--that make up the character of inquiry. He then successively works himself through the educational areas that have been named above, first of all science education, a context in which inquiry is the most likely to occur or to be practiced. The familiarity of these subjects with the nature of inquiry derives from the tradition of experimentation and testing of physical and chemical laws. But Johnston clearly points out that one would be mistaken to reduce inquiry solely to the context of these experimentations. Sciences such as biology, geography, and mathematics provide a far wider range of contexts to which inquiry can be applied. A second area he discusses is social science education. There, he points out that it is the existential situations of people in all their manifestations, which are investigated (p. 48). He eventually looks at art and art education as well as embodiment and physical education and argues them to be as highly important for inquiry as any other subject. As a conclusion, James Scott Johnston summarizes the most important elements of inquiry within the fields of education that he has discussed. It becomes obvious that one of teachers' hardest tasks is to establish an unsettled situation in which a problem is created--a problem that is genuine for the students--but at the same time one of the essential elements for a successful inquiry classroom. Discussion Johnston takes the overall aim of this book--to show how inquiry works in various fields of education--very seriously. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.042
Scholarly communication0.0170.035
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicPragmatism in Philosophy and EducationFrench-language works237,207