Bibliographic record
Abstract
Johnston, J.S. (2009). Deweyan inquiry: From education theory to practice. Albany: Suny Press. 97 pages, ISBN: 978-0-7914-9355-7 Introduction Decades have passed since the paradigm shift in education theory regarding student-centredness altered learning and education; the aim was to have no more teacher-centered classrooms, no artificial textbook exercises, and no student passivity. The intended result of this shift was activity-based classrooms, in which students work together in groups on relevant tasks, experiment, and exchange thoughts and ideas in order to tackle problems and obstacles to gain an extensive understanding of the matter. In this model, the teacher accompanies students as a facilitator. Today, however, peeping into classrooms, one has to admit that--for whatever reasons--the textbooks have somehow found a way to prevail. One can still hear the teacher speak for most of the time, and relevant tasks and projects are initiated scarcely. James Scott Johnston tries to contribute to the understanding of this divide between education theory and practice by having a closer look into Dewey's comprehensive work. He puts his focus of attention onto the so-called and takes a closer look at the most important terms of Dewey's theory of education and pragmatism. He clearly states, however, that his work is not intended to substitute Dewey's work, but that his overall aim is to point out how can be of use in several fields of education, such as science education, social science education, art and art education, and embodiment and physical education. Johnston starts off with a general introduction into the idea of inquiry, the specific context in which inquiry can take place and what the methods and techniques of inquiry look like. The reader gets to know the ideas behind various terms--such as situation, self-correction, and universal conception--that make up the character of inquiry. He then successively works himself through the educational areas that have been named above, first of all science education, a context in which inquiry is the most likely to occur or to be practiced. The familiarity of these subjects with the nature of inquiry derives from the tradition of experimentation and testing of physical and chemical laws. But Johnston clearly points out that one would be mistaken to reduce inquiry solely to the context of these experimentations. Sciences such as biology, geography, and mathematics provide a far wider range of contexts to which inquiry can be applied. A second area he discusses is social science education. There, he points out that it is the existential situations of people in all their manifestations, which are investigated (p. 48). He eventually looks at art and art education as well as embodiment and physical education and argues them to be as highly important for inquiry as any other subject. As a conclusion, James Scott Johnston summarizes the most important elements of inquiry within the fields of education that he has discussed. It becomes obvious that one of teachers' hardest tasks is to establish an unsettled situation in which a problem is created--a problem that is genuine for the students--but at the same time one of the essential elements for a successful inquiry classroom. Discussion Johnston takes the overall aim of this book--to show how inquiry works in various fields of education--very seriously. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.035 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".