Investigation of Swelling, Adsorption and Mechanical Properties of Sodium Acrylate Based Hydrogel and Cryogels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bu çalışmada, sodyum akrilat esaslı hidrojel ve kriyojellerin şişme davranışları (şişme kapasitesi, denge şişme değeri ve şişme kinetiği), boyar madde (metilen mavisi) adsorpsiyonu ve mekanik özellikleri karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir.Kinetik paramatreler, doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan metotlar kullanılarak belirlenmiştir.Buna ek olarak, kriyojel ve hidrojel yapıların yüzey morfolojileri, taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) kullanılarak karakterize edilmiştir.Analizlerden elde edilen tüm sonuçlar karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmiştir.In this study, swelling behavior (swelling capacity, equilibrium swelling ratio and swelling kinetics), basic dye (methylene blue) adsorption and mechanical properties of sodium acrylate based hydrogel and cryogels were comparatively investigated.Kinetic parameters were determined using linear and non-linear methods.In addition, the surface morphologies of cryogel and hydrogel structures were characterized using by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).All results obtained from analyses were comparatively evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".