Review: Fire and the Full Moon <i>Canada and Indonesia in a Decolonizing World</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIRE AND THE FULL MOON Canada and Indonesia in a Decolonizing World David Webster Vancouver University of British Columbia Press, 2009. 272PP, $32.95 paper ISBN 9780774816847In standard texts on post-Second World War foreign policy, Indonesia is scarcely noted, and it receives only a rare mention in studies of overseas development assistance. It was only after the 1991 Dili massacre in East Timoi (which Indonesia invaded in 1975 and which achieved independence in 2002) that Canadian-Indonesian relations began to receive more attention. The focus, however, was primarily on East Timor and the coverage did not really touch on events before the 1970s. With Fire and the Full Moon, David Webster confronts these gaps in the literature, situating more recent developments within a larger historical trajectory of alliance-driven foreign policy, and tracing the influence of relations with Indonesia on Canada's self-perception as a helpful mediator in world affairs.Indonesia, Webster reveals, has been a relatively marginal but recurrent concern for decision-makers since the Second World War. A great strength of this book is the detail it offers on relations between the two countries, especially during the first two decades after the war. As a work of history, it provides the first account of Canada's involvement in decolonization in and around Indonesia, with chapters devoted to the active part Canada played in the negotiations that led to Indonesian independence (1945-49), me minimal connections Canada forged with Indonesia through the Colombo plan (1950-63), the limited role Canada defined for itself during the international crises over the future of West New Guinea (1957-63) and British-administered territories in northern Borneo (1963-66), and the shift in emphasis from the promotion of economic interests to the pursuit of a political solution for East Timor (1968-99). In developing this historical narrative, which draws on extensive primary (especially archival) research, Webster recalls little-known aspects of Canadian-Indonesian relations, for instance that Canada supplied a Dutch division that fought in postwar Indonesia, opened its first southeast Asian embassy in Indonesia, and first sent military aid to the region in the 1960s in response to Indonesia's confrontational approach to northern Borneo. Moreover, aside from reconstructing these events in diplomatic history, Webster employs the Indonesian case to develop two core claims about the nature of foreign policy.The first is that Canadian government policies [towards Indonesia] on decolonization flowed from alliance-driven thinking (4). Although others (such as Robert Bothwell) have made similar arguments, Webster reveals how the alliance mentality affected the margins (a decolonizing country) rather than the centre (western countries) of foreign policy. For example, in facilitating Indonesian independence, Canada sought an orderly process that would prevent splits within the Commonwealth and divisions with Holland and United States in the North Atlantic community. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".