Thermodynamic Analysis of Hydraulic Braking Energy Recovery Systems for a Vehicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a thermodynamic analysis of a hydraulic braking energy recovery system used in vehicles is performed for newly developed systems. The present system is related to the field of energy efficiency in vehicles. The energy recovery system comprises a first pump, a hydraulic accumulator, and a hydraulic motor. The first pump is a variable displacement hydraulic pump (VDP). The hydraulic accumulator is connected to the first pump which operates to store hydraulic fluid under pressure. The hydraulic motor is hydraulically connected to the accumulator to receive hydraulic fluid. The motor is adapted to drive a second hydraulic pump, which is hydraulically connected to the auxiliary system, using hydraulic energy stored in the accumulator. The overall charging and discharging efficiencies, and the overall system efficiency is calculated and presented in this paper. For the purpose of the analysis, EES (engineering equation solver) is used. In addition, parametric studies are performed to observe the effects of different substantial parameters, namely, the inlet pressure and temperature of the accumulator, and the reference environment temperature, in order to investigate the variations in the system performance in terms of the efficiencies. Two systems are developed and it is found that the charging and discharging efficiencies for one system are 83.81% and 87.73%, while for the other system the charging and discharging efficiencies are 81.84% and 85.67%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".