Towards a revised climatology of summertime dimethylsulfide concentrations and sea–air fluxes in the Southern Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental context The trace gas dimethylsulfide (DMS) is emitted from surface ocean waters to the overlying atmosphere, where it forms aerosols that promote cloud formation and influence Earth’s climate. We present an updated climatology of DMS emissions from the vast Southern Ocean, demonstrating how the inclusion of new data yields higher regional sources compared with previously derived values. Our work provides an important step towards better quantifying the oceanic emissions of an important climate-active gas. Abstract The Southern Ocean is a dominant source of the climate-active gas dimethylsulfide (DMS) to the atmosphere. Despite significant improvements in data coverage over the past decade, the most recent global DMS climatology does not include a growing number of high-resolution surface measurements in Southern Ocean waters. Here, we incorporate these high resolution data (~700 000 measurements) into an updated Southern Ocean climatology of summertime DMS concentrations and sea–air fluxes. Owing to sparse monthly data coverage, we derive a single summertime climatology based on December through February means. DMS frequency distributions and oceanographic properties (mixed-layer depth and chlorophyll-a) show good general coherence across these months, providing justification for the use of summertime mean values. The revised climatology shows notable differences with the existing global climatology. In particular, we find increased DMS concentrations and sea–air fluxes south of the Polar Frontal zone (between ~60 and 70°S), and increased sea–air fluxes in mid-latitude waters (40–50°S). These changes are attributable to both the inclusion of new data and the use of region-specific parameters (e.g. data cut-off thresholds and interpolation radius) in our objective analysis. DMS concentrations in the Southern Ocean exhibit weak though statistically significant correlations with several oceanographic variables, including ice cover, mixed-layer depth and chlorophyll-a, but no apparent relationship with satellite-derived measures of phytoplankton photophysiology or taxonomic group abundance. Our analysis highlights the importance of using regional parameters in constructing climatological DMS fields, and identifies regions where additional observations are most needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".