Geometry, scaling relationships and emplacement dynamics of a ca. 6 Ma shallow felsic sill complex, Calamita Peninsula, Elba Island, Italy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7 Conclusions The Calamita sills exhibit similar geometric scaling to other felsic sills, once sampling bias is considered. For the Elba data unrealistically high magma viscosities and or volumetric flow rates are required to fit the viscosity dominated regime. However, the fracture-toughness dominated regime brackets the data well if field-scale fracture toughness values exceed laboratory values by one to two orders of magnitude. Such high effective fracture toughness values are feasible if there is extensive interaction and branching between growing sills and or if magma freezing at sill extremities leads to armoring of the crack tip process zone. Similar mechanical questions arise for the scaling of other felsic sills as well as mafic dykes. References Bunger, A.P. , and E. Detournay (2005), Asymptotic solution for a penny-shaped near-surface hydraulic fracture. Engineering fracture mechanics, 72(16):2468-2486. Cruden, A., and K. McCaffrey (2006), Dimensional scaling relationships of tabular igneous intrusions and their implications for a size, depth, and compositionally dependent spectrum of emplacement processes in the crust. EOS Trans. AGU, 87, Abstract V12B-06. Mazzarin, F., and Musemeci, G. (2008), Hydrofracturing-related sill and dyke emplacement at shallow crustal levels: the Eastern Elba Dyke Complex, Italy. Geol. Soc. London, Sp. Publ. 320, 121-129. 1 Dimensional Scaling of Tabular Intrusions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it