MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2232754646 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b05626

Toward the Ultimate Limit of Connectivity in Quantum Dots with High Mobility and Clean Gaps

2016· article· en· W2232754646 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Huashan Li, David Zhitomirsky, Shreya H. Dave, Jeffrey C. Grossman

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceSamsung
KeywordsQuantum dotNanocrystalNanotechnologyMaterials sciencePassivationQuantumBand gapNanoscopic scaleOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) are highly versatile nanoscale optoelectronic building blocks, but despite their materials engineering flexibility, there is a considerable lack of fundamental understanding of their electronic structure as they couple within thin films. By employing a joint experimental-theoretical study, we reveal the impact of connectivity in CQD assemblies, going beyond the single CQD picture. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) demonstrates connectivity motifs across different CQD sizes and length scales and provides the necessary perspective to build robust computational models to systematically study the achievable degree of connectivity in these materials. We focused on state-of-the-art surface ligand treatments, taking into account both the degree of connectivity and nanocrystal orientation, and performed ab initio simulations within the phonon-assisted hopping regime. Importantly, both the TEM studies and our simulation results revealed morphological and electronic defects that could dramatically reduce optoelectronic performance, and yet would not have been captured within a single CQD model that neglects connectivity. We calculate carrier mobility in the presence of such defect states and conclude that the best-achievable CQD assemblies for optoelectronics will require a modest degree of fusing via the {001} facet, followed by atomic ligand passivation to generate a clean band gap and unprecedentedly high charge transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207