Rural Homelessness in Canada: Directions for Planning and Research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Until recently, there was little acknowledgement that homelessness existed in rural areas in Canada. With a few exceptions, most research and intervention has concentrated on individuals and families living in urban areas; consequently homelessness has most often been framed as an urban phenomenon. Rural homelessness was unacknowledged, until reports from diverse rural areas began to emerge in the last decade which shed light on the unique context of the issue. The aim of this research was to examine and describe the dimensions of rural homelessness across Canada, the locations and contexts that have been studied, and assess the extent of common themes across provinces and regions. In this process, we were able to provide a preliminary assessment of: obstacles to identification and intervention; the challenges in determining prevalence of rural homelessness and its characteristics; determining access to shelter, food and support services, and what factors contribute to housing crises in rural areas. As there is still a scarcity of information about rural specific elements, planning and implementation responses would be enhanced through the development of a combination of a research network to facilitate knowledge mobilization and a research agenda on rural homelessness. Recommendations suggest the need for a fulsome research agenda on rural homelessness in Canada be developed to capture common emerging themes from a provincial rather than community-by-community perspective. This can, and should be coordinated with international and local efforts to examine rural homelessness. Keywords: homelessness, housing, rural, Canada, housing first, migration ------------------------------------------------------------ Resume Jusqu'a recemment, on reconnaissait peu le phenomene des sans-abris en milieux ruraux au Canada. Avec quelques exceptions, la plupart des recherches et interventions se sont concentrees sur des individus et des familles vivant dans des zones urbaines; par consequent le phenomene des sans-abris a souvent ete considere comme un phenomene urbain. Le phenomene des sans-abris rural etait meconnu jusqu'a ce que des rapports de diverses regions rurales commencent a voir le jour ces dix dernieres annees, faisant lumiere sur le contexte unique du probleme. Le but de la recherche etait d'examiner et de decrire les dimensions de l'itinerance rurale a travers le Canada, les lieux et les contextes qui ont ete etudies, ainsi que d'evaluer l'extension de themes communs a travers les provinces et les regions. Dans ce processus, nous avons pu fournir une evaluation preliminaire: des obstacles a l'identification et a l'intervention, des defis qui determinent la prevalence de l'itinerance rurale et ses caracteristiques; determiner l'acces aux abris, a la nourriture et aux services de support, ainsi que les facteurs qui contribuent aux crises du logement dans les zones rurales. Puisqu'il y a toujours un manque d'information concernant les elements specifiques ruraux, la planification et l'implantation de reponses pourraient etre ameliorees a travers le developpement d'une combinaison d'un reseau de recherche pour faciliter la mobilisation du savoir et un agenda de recherche sur le phenomene des sans-abris en milieu rurale. Les recommandations mentionnent le besoin d'un agenda de recherche complet a perspective Provinciale plutot qu'a perspective commune par commune. Cela peut, et devrait etre coordonne avec des efforts locaux et internationaux pour examiner l'itinerance rurale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".