MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W223299185

Study on high-yield characteristics of source and sink in Yangliangyou 6.

2009· article· en· W223299185 on OpenAlexaff
Hongxi Zhang, Hongjuan Ji, Xiao Ning, Tan ChangLe, Xiaoxiang Zhang, Yuhong Li, Zhu Zhao-bin, Zhengyuan Dai, Bu-Hong ZHAO

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSink (geography)PhotosynthesisGrain yieldEnvironmental scienceAgronomyComputer scienceMathematicsBiologyBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With three-line hybrid rice Shanyou 63 as control,the high-yield characteristecs of source and sink in two-line hybrid rice,Yangliangyou 6 was studied.Results showed that,compared with Shanyou 63,Yangliangyou 6 was superior in sink capability and its sink filling ability,photosynthetic ability,accumulation and translocation of photosynthetic product,synchronous increase of source-flow-sink.Yangliangyou 6 had excellent characters of high percentage of filled grain and grain-filling rate,which was an important improvement of seed-setting ability in two-line hybrid rice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207