MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2233031612 · doi:10.1142/s1793042117500014

Central limit theorem for Artin L-functions

2016· preprint· en· W2233031612 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter J. Cho, Henry H. Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Number Theory · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsCentral limit theoremCongruence (geometry)Limit (mathematics)GaussianInfinityCharacter (mathematics)Pure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryQuantum mechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that the sum of the traces of Frobenius elements of Artin [Formula: see text]-functions in a family of [Formula: see text]-fields satisfies the Gaussian distribution under certain counting conjectures. We prove the counting conjectures for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]-fields. We also prove a central limit theorem for the [Formula: see text]-functions of modular forms on congruence subgroups [Formula: see text] as [Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Number TheorySame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207