Situación legal del impuesto de alumbrado público, frente a las facultades impositivas de los concejos municipales para optar y reglamentar este impuesto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is essential to determine the legality of the tax on public lighting. In this vein, it is wise to know whether the municipal councils have the power to choose and regulate the tax in their respective territories, from the orbit jurisprudential development both administrative law and the tax law. With the development of jurisprudence after the enactment of Law 97 of 1913 (the tax authority on public lighting service) and Act 84 of 1915 it was extended to other municipalities, to date has raised several theses for and against the legality of the tax. For that reason, it is necessary to study deeply the subject, and their development over time. It is necessary, to solve this question , in order to establish a line of decisions to the future, to the extent that municipalities would be extremely affected in the event that the State Council, to take the opposite view. In order to achieve this goal, we will review all judgments issued by the State Council and the Constitutional Court from 1913 to 2011 relating to this topic, focusing more attention on the failures of the past two decades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".