MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2233418923 · doi:10.1107/s2056989016000220

Crystal structure of<i>catena</i>-poly[[[<i>trans</i>-bis(acetonitrile-κ<i>N</i>)diaquacobalt(II)]-μ-pyrazine-κ<sup>2</sup><i>N</i>:<i>N</i>′] dinitrate]

2016· article· en· W2233418923 on OpenAlexafffund
Chen Liu, Ashley C. Felts, Annaliese E. Thuijs, Aaron Useche, Khalil A. Abboud

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersUniversity of FloridaResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and LabradorNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPyrazineAcetonitrileChemistryMoleculeHydrogen bondDenticityCrystallographyCrystal structureOctahedronCoordination polymerCoordination sphereCationic polymerizationStereochemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The central structural motif of the title coordination polymer, [Co(NO3)2(C4H4N2)(CH3CN)2(H2O)2] n , is a chain composed of Co(II) ions linked by bis-monodentate bridging pyrazine ligands through their N atoms. The Co(II) ion is located on an inversion center and is additionally coordinated by two O atoms of water mol-ecules and two N atoms of aceto-nitrile mol-ecules. The resultant N4O2 coordination sphere is distorted octa-hedral. The linear cationic chains extend parallel to the a axis and are aligned into layers parallel to the ac plane. Nitrate anions are situated in the space between the Co(II) chains and form O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the coordinating water mol-ecules, leading to a three-dimensional network structure. Weak C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds are also present between pyrazine or aceto-nitrile mol-ecules and the nitrate anions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207