Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the history of Canadian poetry, one may see three distinct phases, namely, Confederation to the World War I, the 1920s to the World War II, and the late twentieth century to the early twenty-first century. The Canadian poets who appeared during the first phase were largely influenced by the English Romantics and the early Victorians, and looked for themes in their own natural landscape. The poets of the second phase, with the emergence of modernism, created an outlet for the new poetry and reflected their fascination with the sea and with the impersonal violence of nature. But it is only in the third phase, Canadian poetry has undergone radical change with the contribution of poets like Earle Birney and others. These poets exhibited a new social awareness and came out with experimental poetry characterized by cosmopolitanism, metaphysical strains, symbolism, and so on. An attempt is made in the present paper to examine Earle Birney’s three poems - 'David,' 'November Walk,' and 'The Bear on the Delhi Road.' They are extracted from three of his representative anthologies David and Other Poems (1942), Near False Creek Mouth (1964), and Fall and Fury (1978) which show Birney’s encyclopedic knowledge on Canadian subjects and also virtually every part of the globe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".