MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2233709708 · doi:10.1177/229255030501300102

Anomalous Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Muscle Transposition for Vascular Coverage of the Median Nerve in Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2005· review· en· W2233709708 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael W. Neumeister, Arian Mowlavi, Robert C. Russell, Bradon J. Wilhelmi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarpal tunnel syndromeTransposition (logic)Median nerveAnatomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome is uncommon yet troublesome. Significant adhesions and scarring around the median nerve can render it relatively ischemic. A number of vascular flaps have been described to provide vascular coverage in attempts to decrease further cicatricial adhesions and to improve local blood supply around the median nerve. A rare case of an anomalous muscle in the distal forearm used as tissue to provide good vascularized coverage of the median nerve that was severely scarred in its bed is reported. The anomalous muscle was distal to the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon and inserted in the palmar fascia on the ulnar aspect of the hand. Referring branches from the ulnar artery provided vascular supply to the anomalous muscle. The muscle on these vascular pedicles was transposed over the median nerve, providing good, stable, unscarred coverage. The patient had an excellent result with resolution of the carpal tunnel symptoms. The redundant anomalous muscle provided a unique vascularized source for coverage of the median nerve in recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plastic SurgerySame topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207