La pratique des sentiers périurbains de Balagne (Corse) par les habitants : marcher pour réinventer sa vi(ll)e
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude des sentiers périurbains de Balagne en haute Corse à travers leur appréhension par les habitants doit nous permettre d’analyser le rôle des cheminements à la lisière de l’urbanité et de la ruraalité dans la dynamique d’appropriation territoriale. Après avoir présenté le contexte particulier de l’enquête ethnographique menée depuis 2013, cet article s’intéresse aux postures des corps lors des promenades ainsi qu’à la mobilisation des sens. Il s’agit de comprendre la relation sensible qui se noue aux lieux et ce qu’elle dit de l’attachement au territoire. De la même façon, les registres discursifs mobilisés par les usagers sont analysés afin de déterminer en quoi la marche en littoral urbain permet à la fois de définir une appartenance à l’écoumène et de se redécouvrir soi-même.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".