MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The development og CD138high Breg in AAD is dependent on Semaphorin 4C (IRM10P.614)

2015· article· en· W2234104601 on OpenAlexaff
Di Xue, Maziar Divangahi, Bruce Mazer, Barbara C. Mindt, Marianne Béland, Ryan Fiter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)McGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have previously found that mice with Semaphorin 4C (Sema4C) deficient B cells exhibited exaggerated airway damage and pulmonary inflammation during allergic airways disease (AAD). We aimed to determine the mechanisms by which Sema4C on B-cells regulates AAD. Following allergen exposure, Sema4C-/- AAD mice had significantly fewer CD138high IL-10+ B cells (CD138high Breg) and significantly increased CD138high IL4+ B cells in spleen. In vitro, Sema4C-/- B cells consistently failed to differentiate into CD138high Breg under Th2 culture conditions. Adoptive transfer of Sema4C-/- plasma cells induced exacerbated Th2 responses, with airway eosinophilia and increased IL-4+ inflammatory cell infiltrates in the lungs. In contrast, transfer of CD138high Breg to WT mice with AAD dramatically alleviated airway inflammation. Co-culturing Sema4C-/- B cells with Sema4C transfected cells (Hek293-Sema4C) corrected impaired CD138high Breg development. Co-culture of B cells with Hek293-Sema4C decreased IgE production for both WT and Sema4C-/- B cells. Sema4C is essential for the development of CD138high Breg and may play a crucial role in the auto-regulation of B cells in allergic inflammation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingFrench-language works237,207