MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2234308341 · doi:10.12957/epp.2015.20262

Um diálogo entre a teoria ator-rede e a proposta artística de Hélio Oiticica: o que a psicologia tem a ver com isso?

2015· article· pt· W2234308341 on OpenAlexaff
Débora Emanuelle Nascimento Lomba

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente trabalho é uma releitura da monografia "Eu sou uma obra de arte, o museu é um mundo", cujas questões trabalhadas envolvem a proposta artística de Hélio Oiticica, bem como sua aproximação com uma maneira alternativa de pensar a psicologia, a saber, a teoria ator-rede (TAR). Com isso, temos tanto um trabalho que une psicologia e arte, como um trabalho que problematiza as práticas em psicologia. Dessa forma, serve de apoio para esta discussão, uma bagunça na maneira de pensar e fazer psicologia, totalmente embasadas pelos autores da TAR e dialogando com Hélio Oiticica. Uma discussão que inclui diversos atores e faz compor uma proposta política diferente da lógica dominante na psicologia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudos e Pesquisas em PsicologiaSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207