Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Caption title. Rhymed letters and songs printed in three columns. Dated 22 June 1868. This is the second edition. It was printed in the office of the Cariboo Sentinel on the first press brought into British Columbia. Anderson's verses give many sidelights on the life in a mining town in the mid- 1860's. For more information on the poet, etc., see William Kaye Lamb, Sawney's letters, or Cariboo rhymes (entry 2094). No copy of the first edition exists. It was advertised in an issue of the Cariboo Sentinel dated 30 July 1866, and described as being printed on a sheet of letter paper. The third and considerably enlarged edition was published in 1869 under title: Sawney's letters and Cariboo songs (Barkerville, Printed at the Cariboo Sentinel Office). In 28, 24 pages. Another edition was published in 1895 in 49 pages by W. S. Johnston & Co'y, Toronto. The 1868 edition was printed in mimeographed form in 1950 with an introduction by William Kaye Lamb under title: Sawney's letters (Toronto, Bibliographical Society of Canada). In 26 pages. The verses appeared in 1962 in 64 pages with an introduction by Willard E. Ireland under title: Sawney's letters and Cariboo rhymes (Victoria, Published by the Barkerville Restoration Advisory Committee of the Province of British Columbia)." -- Lowther, B. J., & Laing, M. (1968). A bibliography of British Columbia: Laying the foundations, 1849-1899. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, p. 35.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.165 | 0.062 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".