MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2234397202

Mobile populations by walking: the representation of on an empirical research on public spaces in the city of Turin, Italy

2015· article· en· W2234397202 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Social Issues and Migration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Representation (politics)PopulationSubject (documents)GeographySociologyPublic spacePublic relationsPolitical scienceDemographyComputer scienceLibrary scienceArchitectural engineeringEngineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The factual data presented in the poster derive from the research program of relevant national interest (PRIN 2009) titled: "Public spaces, mobile populations and processes of urban reorganisation" that we realized in the city of Turin, Italy. We proceed doing some in-depth interview and doing some direct observation of some significant public spaces in the City Centre, in the San Salvario district and in the quarter of Barriera di Milano. We illustrate the practice of walking in those public spaces recognizing the intention of the subject by their characteristics (age, type of population, numerousness etc.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.353
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it