MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2234517310 · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000000500

Blunt Policy Instruments Deliver Blunt Policy Outcomes

2016· letter· en· W2234517310 on OpenAlexaffabout
Beverley M. Essue, Stephen Birch

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Care · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare cost, quality, practices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluntResearch centrePolitical scienceHealth policyHealth economicsLibrary scienceHealth centrePublic administrationMedicineHealth careFamily medicineLawSurgeryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

*Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University †Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney ‡Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester B.M.E. is the recipient of a Sidney Sax Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medication Research Council of Australia. She has no conflicts of interest to declare. S.B. has no conflicts of interest to declare. Reprints: Beverley M. Essue, PhD, MPH, McMaster University, CHEPA, CRL Building 282, 1280 Main Street, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4K1. E-mail: [email protected].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.443
GPT teacher head0.571
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical CareSame topicHealthcare cost, quality, practicesFrench-language works237,207