MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enforcement of Foreign Non-Monetary Judgments in Canada (And Beyond)

2007· article· en· W2234575015 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen G. A. Pitel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Private International Law · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnforcementLawSupreme courtPolitical scienceChoice of lawPaymentCommon lawLaw and economicsEconomicsBusinessConflict of lawsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Pro Swing Inc v Elta Golf Inc the Supreme Court of Canada has continued its development of the common law rules for the enforcement of foreign judgments. It has abandoned the longstanding orthodoxy that to be enforceable a foreign judgment must be for the payment of money. Under the court’s new approach, non-monetary judgments such as injunctions and mandatory orders from other jurisdictions are now enforceable. This article analyses the reasoning behind the court’s liberalization of this aspect of the law on judgment enforcement. It argues that the decision is a positive step forward, one that offers important guidance on how the law might develop in other common law jurisdictions and on how other elements of the rules for enforcement might be revised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Private International LawSame topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207