Nasiebou in 'n eenheidstaat versus die toekenning van groepregte : diskoerse oor die akkommodering van diversiteit met spesifieke verwysing na Afrika en Suid-Afrika : geesteswetenskappe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Na aanleiding van onlangse uitsprake van Suid-Afrikaanse leiers word nasiebou in 'n eenheidstaat en die uitsluitlike toekenning van individuele regte versus stelsels vir die erkenning van groepregte in heterogene en diep verdeelde samelewings in hierdie artikel krities bespreek. Daar word eerstens gekyk na die tekortkominge van individuele regte, asook na teoriee oor liberale multikulturalisme waarin die toekenning van groepregte as 'n noodsaaklike uitbreiding van liberale en demokratiese stelsels beskou word. Aandag word verder gegee aan die idees van die Kanadese politieke ontleder Will Kymlicka oor gedifferensieerde groepregte, asook diskoerse en menings daaroor. 'n Kernelement van Kymlicka se stelsel van gedifferensieerde groepregte is dat groepe nie verskil slegs wat taal en kultuur betref nie, maar ook ten opsigte van die verhouding waarin hulle tot die staat wil staan. Die erkenning van diep diversiteit binne 'n multinasionale en/of multikulturele staat word vervolgens bespreek. Die probleme wat Afrika en Suid-Afrika rondom diversiteit ervaar, die aard van strategiee om hierdie probleme te oorkom, en die mislukking van nasiebou om eenheidstate in Afrika te skep, kom ook onder die loep. Laastens word meer spesifiek aandag gegee aan nasiebou in Suid-Afrika sedert die totstandkoming van 'n nuwe bedeling, navorsing oor patrone van groepsidentifisering, en die implikasies vir die bestuur van diversiteit in Suid-Afrika. Ten slotte word 'n meer genuanseerde debat oor diversiteit en groepregte, wat strook met gesofistikeerde debatte wat in die res van die wereld gevoer word, bepleit. Nation-building in a unitary state versus group rights: discourses on the accommodation of diversity in heterogeneous states with specific reference to Africa and South Africa In the introduction of this article the focus falls on the opinions of prominent South African leaders on the relationship between the majority and the minority in post-apartheid South Africa. These opinions echo the political liberalism and nation-building ideologies that have not only dominated discourses on societal diversity in South Africa since 1994, but have also been the dominant models for handling heterogeneity in Africa and elsewhere in the world. In contrast to discourses on nation-building and political liberalism which emphasise a unitary civic state, individual dignity and human rights, the article focuses in particular on the work of the Canadian political philosopher Will Kymlicka (1995) regarding liberal multiculturalism and the rights of minorities in heterogeneous and deeply divided states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".