MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2234929893 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw083

Identification of Globular Cluster Stars in RAVE data II: Extended tidal debris around NGC 3201

2016· article· en· W2234929893 on OpenAlexafffund
Borja Anguiano, G. M. De Silva, K. C. Freeman, G. S. Da Costa, T. Zwitter, Alice C. Quillen, D. B. Zucker, Julio F. Navarro, Andrea Kunder, A. Siebert, R. F. G. Wyse, E. K. Grebel, G. Kordopatis, B. K. Gibson, G. M. Seabroke, Sanjib Sharma, Jennifer Wojno, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, Q. A. Parker, Matthias Steinmetz, C. Boeche, G. Gilmore, O. Bienaymé, W. Reid, Fred Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersU.S. Naval ObservatoryLeibniz-GemeinschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamAustralian Astronomical Optics-MacquarieDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAgence Nationale de la RechercheW. M. Keck FoundationJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSMacquarie UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGlobular clusterAstrophysicsStarsAstronomyProper motionStar clusterCluster (spacecraft)DebrisBlue straggler

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the identification of extended tidal debris potentially associated with the globular cluster NGC 3201, using the RAdial Velocity Experiment (RAVE) catalogue. We find the debris stars are located at a distance range of 1–7 kpc based on the forthcoming RAVE distance estimates. The derived space velocities and integrals of motion show interesting connections to NGC 3201, modulo uncertainties in the proper motions. Three stars, which are among the four most likely candidates for NGC 3201 tidal debris, are separated by 80° on the sky yet are well matched by the 12 Gyr, [Fe/H] = −1.5 isochrone appropriate for the cluster. This is the first time tidal debris around this cluster has been reported over such a large spatial extent, with implications for the cluster's origin and dynamical evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→