MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2235046371 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0094

PROPOSING A NEW ACOUSTIC EMISSION PARAMETER FOR BEARING CONDITION MONITORING IN ROTATING MACHINES

2013· article· en· W2235046371 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Seyed Ali Niknam, Victor Songméné, Yhj Au

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersÉcole de technologie supérieure
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Rotational speedAcoustic emissionProcess (computing)Condition monitoringWork (physics)Standard deviationAcousticsRolling-element bearingComputer scienceStructural engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringVibrationPhysicsMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bearings are important machine parts and their condition is often critical to success of an operation or process, hence there is a great need for periodic knowledge of their performance. According to reported research works in the past several years, it is believed that the extracted information from acoustic emission (AE) signals can be used for bearing condition monitoring. In this work, a novel parameter based on using the ratio of AE mean (μ) and AE standard deviation (σ), formulated as μ/σ is proposed to distinguish between lubricated and dry bearings. A heavy duty test rig was used in experimental work. Various levels of radial loads and rotational speed (ω) were applied to rotating shaft, which is connected to rolling element bearings. It was found that, except few cases, regardless of various levels of radial loads used, at higher levels of rotational speed, dry and lubricated bearings can be clearly distinguished when using proposed parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207