<i>Illogic and polemic: The</i> coq‐à‐l’âne <i>during the Wars of Religion</i>*
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article seeks to show how the genre of the coq‐à‐l’âne created by Clément Marot regained popularity at the end of the sixteenth century in the midst of the Wars of Religion. These poems are usually anonymous, composed by members of one or another of the three warring groups (Catholics, Protestants, and ‘Politiques’). They create an impression of absurdity that is nonetheless militant. Characterized by a loose structure and the use of animal metaphors, they employ a form of partisan rhetoric that is both aggressive and comic. The vogue for coq‐à‐l’âne , which were frequently set to music and sung, can also be seen as proof that the religious and political arguments were by now exhausted: all that remained was the desire to ridicule one's enemy, to destroy him with word games. This strategy was typical of French writing in the late Renaissance: when used in militant and comic texts the vernacular could reach out to the entire nation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it