MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2235115478 · doi:10.1193/011715eqs011m

Out‐of‐Plane Dynamic Stability of Unreinforced Masonry Walls in One‐Way Bending: Parametric Study and Assessment Guidelines

2016· article· en· W2235115478 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Spectra · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnreinforced masonry buildingStructural engineeringParametric statisticsMasonryEarthquake shaking tableBendingStability (learning theory)Plane (geometry)Geotechnical engineeringEngineeringGround motionGeologyComputer scienceMathematicsGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical rigid body model for the out‐of‐plane response of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls connected to flexible diaphragms is validated against the shake table test results presented in a companion paper. It is demonstrated that the model is able to reproduce the observed rocking behavior with reasonable accuracy, particularly the intensity of shaking resulting in collapse of the walls. The validated model is used to undertake a parametric study investigating the effects of numerous parameters on out‐of‐plane wall stability. Ground motion variability is accounted for by using a large suite of motions. Based on the results of the modeling, an updated out‐of‐plane assessment procedure is proposed. The procedure, which could be incorporated into ASCE 41, provides reference curves of h / t versus S a (1.0), along with correction factors for axial load, wall thickness, ground‐level walls, and exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it