MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2235347446

Turning Round About: The Use of Nursery Rhyme in Daphne Marlatt’s Ana Historic

2013· article· en· W2235347446 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shane Neilson

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeRhymeFemininityRepetition (rhetorical device)PicnicPatriarchyCognitive dissonanceArtSociologyAestheticsLiteraturePoetryPsychologyVisual artsGender studiesLinguisticsSocial psychologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ana Historic is primarily a feminist critique of the pedagogical methods that mothers use in relation to daughters. Through her own example and through direct verbal instruction to Annie, Ina attempts to instill a traditional notion of femininity in her daughter. The novel “turns round about” Ina’s pedagogy through various means, one of which is the troubling of Ina’s nursery rhymes. This paper considers the strategic use of “Teddy Bears’ Picnic,” “Mother May I Go and Bathe,” and “Polly Put the Kettle On” and their function in the novel’s feminist narrative to demonstrate the ways in which Marlatt’s use of nursery rhymes provides dissonance with the novel’s dramatization of masculine pedagogies and also creates poetic concordances in order to disempower the patriarchy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207