DRDC Ottawa Participation in the SILENE Accident Dosimetry Intercomparison Exercise. June 10-21, 2002
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DRDC Ottawa (and formerly as DREO) has participated in two NATO-sponsored and one TTCP-sponsored dosimetry intercomparisons. The SILENE International Accident Dosimetry Intercomparison Exercise at Valduc, France in June 2002 coincided with DRDC Ottawa work designed to refine its proposed criticality dosimetry system (consisting of Rh foils for neutron dosimetry and the combination of CaF2:Mn and Al2O3 TLDs for gamma-ray dosimetry). In addition, DRDC Ottawa has recently substantially expanded its efforts in radiation dosimetry - and this intercomparison offered a unique opportunity to showcase and quantify these new capabilities. The results presented herein conclusively show DRDC Ottawa's capabilities to measure accurately criticality fields. In particular the neutron dosimetric work produced near real-time results - consistent with the target doses. The Rh foils clearly demonstrated their arguably most important feature - near invariability of response for all conceivable fission-like spectra. The gamma-ray dosimeters also showed their efficacy. The SILENE International Accident Dosimetry Intercomparison Exercise at Valduc, France in June 2002 was implemented to test the international biodosimetry programs. DRDC Ottawa as well as several other countries participated in the international biodosimetry intercomparison. DRDC Ottawa used a Health Canada generated (137)Cs dose response curve to convert aberration frequencies into dose estimates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".