MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2235579930

David Andress (dir.), Experiencing the French Revolution : Oxford, Voltaire Foundation, University of Oxford, 2013

2015· article· fr· W2235579930 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annie Jourdan

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesFrench revolutionArtPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le livre, edite par la Fondation Voltaire, est le resultat des debats, tenus en 2010, lors du colloque organise par l’Universite de Portsmouth. Le colloque lui-meme reunissait une pleiade d’historiens francais, anglais, australiens, canadiens et americains, tous specialistes de la Revolution francaise. L’objectif etait de reflechir sur les debats recents autour de la dite revolution. L’initiative poursuivait en verite celle initiee par les French Historical Studies (vol. 32, 2009) qui avaient...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française→Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→