MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2235970618

"Hello, abattoir!": Becoming Through Slaughter in Miriam Toews’s A Complicated Kindness

2011· article· en· W2235970618 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ella Soper

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKindnessNarrativeSociologyDepictionAestheticsHistoryArtVisual artsLawLiteraturePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing on the tradition of both the Bildungsroman and the Kunstlerroman , Miriam Toews’s A Complicated Kindness (2004) presents animal slaughter as the central symbol of adolescent becoming. In her depiction of Happy Family Farms, the local chicken processing plant in East Village, Manitoba, Toews offers a rigorous critique of the ways in which the town resists its own cultural erasure by rebranding itself as a town open for business – in this case, factory farming. Because a career at the abattoir is one of the few vocational opportunities open to young people like conflicted Mennonite teenager Nomi Nickels, Toews builds narrative suspense by alluding to the job awaiting Nomi if she chooses to remain in East Village. True to the dynamic structure of the novel, Nomi defers this decision, thus rejecting the closure of having become for the more episodic process of becoming . In this way, Toews crafts an ironic commentary on the teleology of coming-of-age narratives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.031
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207