Analysis of Kinetic Parameters and Effect of Pt Loading on Cell Performance of PEFC Electrodes Prepared by Inkjet Printing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The changes to cell performance, Tafel slope and reaction order with varying Pt loadings and catalyst layer (CL) thickness of 0.014 to 0.1mg/cm 2 and 1 μm to 5.5 μm respectively are studied by using a varietyof oxygen partial pressures for the case of thin, low-loaded inkjet printed electrodes. For 20% Pt/C catalyst, a steep increase in performance was observed as the Pt loading increased to 0.079 mg/cm 2 , corresponding to a CL thickness of around 4.4 μm. At higher Pt loadings, the improvement in the cell performance was substantially reduced. Higher cell performance for the inkjet printed CCMs could be obtained by altering the operating conditions (e.g., operating at a higher back-pressure) rather than increasing the Pt loading. Active area of the electrodes decreased from 57 to 41 m 2 /g as the Pt loading increased from 0.026 to 0.1 mg/cm 2 . Below the transition voltage of 0.8 V iRFree , Tafel slope was found to be a function ofthe Pt loading and oxygen partial pressure (PO 2 ). The kinetic reaction order (γ) increased with increasing overpotential for all the Pt loading cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".