MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2236260854 · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.138297

The Making of DSM-III: A Diagnostic Manual's Conquest of American Psychiatry By Hannah S. Decker Oxford University Press USA. 2013. £35.99 (pb). 466 pp. ISBN 9780195382235

2015· article· en· W2236260854 on OpenAlexaff
Joel Paris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe British Journal of Psychiatry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCONQUESTContent (measure theory)Action (physics)ArtPsychologyHistoryAncient historyPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

mental health clinicians need to be more proactive with their patients by first educating themselves and then their patients.Most importantly, the book takes away the white handkerchief of defeat that clinicians tend to hold up when faced with patients with personality disorder, and replaces it with effective tools to understand personality disorders and manage patients confidently and appropriately.Incorporating this in 66 pages makes this informative book by Dr Newton-Howes a must-have for every clinician.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe British Journal of PsychiatrySame topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyFrench-language works237,207