Palynological analysis and taxonomic position of the genus<i>Mertensia</i>(Boraginaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Palynological analysis of the genus Mertensia Roth, s. lat. (Boraginaceae) was performed. All pollen grains studied were mostly dumbbell shaped and had 6-heteroaperturate pollen type without exception. The type of pollen of Mertensia does not contradict recent classifications that assign Mertensia to Cynoglosseae. Among six sections of Mertensia, pollen grains of section Oreocharis (the Himalayan Mertensia) were different from those of other sections in having granulate sculpturing on the colpus and pseudocolpus membranes. The results, along with other morphological differences, may support Riedl’s treatment of the Himalayan species of Mertensia in the distinct genus Pseudomertensia Riedl. Of the other sections, four monotypic sections (sections Steenhanmera, Neuranthia, Typomertensia, and Mertensianthe) showed pollen structures similar to each other. Pollen grains in section Eumertensia had some variations in size and ornamentation, especially in the species distributed in western North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".