MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2236725917 · doi:10.25071/0843-4182.29039

Jordan Plevnes. La huitième merveille du monde

2006· article· fr· W2236725917 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hédi Bouraoui

Bibliographic record

VenueLittéRéalité · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jordan Plevnes.La huitieme merveiLLe du monde.Roman.Paris: Editions La Table Ronde, 2005. 1 p 11 oue un coup d'""i, c''" un coup de m,;,«!Cc p«mie< mmOll d'un ecrivain macedonien, dramaturge connu en Europe et Amerique, ex-Ambassadeur de son pays, est ecrit directement en fran<;:ais.Il deborde d'imagination bouillonnante, de trouvailles astucieuses, d'anecdotes folkloriques savoureuses basees parfois sur des calculs minutieux, etonnants pour un homme de Lettres.Lintrigue est simple, elle se passe souvent et en premier lieu dans la tete d'Alexandre Simsar.Le prenom de celui-ci, comme celui de son pere, Philippe, n'a rien a voir avec Alexandre le Grand, celebre conquerant et bitisseur de tant d'Alexandrie!Le heros de Plevnes est ma<;:on et fa<;:adier tombe de 1'Eglise du Souvenir a Berlin, mais il n'en est pas mort dans cette chute de 53,5 metres de hauteur!Lidealisme de Simsar est ainsi humoristiquement dramatise au cours de tout le roman.En restant vivant, il va pouvoir imaginer la construction d'un edifice qui serait la huitieme merveille du monde, abreviee par la suite en HMM.Ainsi il compte la bitir sur une momagne macedonienne, Galitchitza, puisque de la, il pourra voir simultanement le lac

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLittéRéalitéSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207