MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2236775993 · doi:10.7202/1034093ar

Le Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec et la documentation des plantes vasculaires en situation précaire

2015· article· fr· W2236775993 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
B Tardif, G. Lavoie, Guy Jolicoeur

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Divers acteurs de la scène biologique québécoise, professionnels ou bénévoles, effectuent des observations sur les espèces en situation précaire au Québec. Ces informations sont exploitées par le Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec (CDPNQ). Cette agrégation des connaissances disponibles sur la répartition des espèces permet de soutenir adéquatement les actions de conservation, d’aménagement et de gestion du territoire, pour lesquelles le CDPNQ est consulté au quotidien. Par cet article, nous souhaitons témoigner de l’importance de cette collaboration implicite et rendre crédit aux contributeurs de données sur les plantes vasculaires, dont un grand nombre agit à titre de bénévoles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Naturaliste canadienSame topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207