MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2237133300 · doi:10.3138/cpp.2014-075

Who Has the Motherlode of Health? A Comparative Study of Socio-economic Inequalities in Health among Mothers of Young Children

2015· article· en· W2237133300 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sarah Brennenstuhl, Diana Worts, Vincent A. Hildebrand, Arjumand Siddiqi, Peggy McDonough

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Public Policy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInequalityDemographic economicsPsychologyGender inequalityDemographySociologyEconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines cross-national differences in socio-economic inequalities in mothers’ health. Inequalities are expected to be largest where social policies treat mothers as unpaid caregivers, smallest where they support mothers as paid workers, and intermediate where policies are inconsistent. Hypotheses are tested using Latent Growth Curve Models for the effects of education on mothers’ self-rated health trajectories; estimates are then compared cross-nationally using z-scores. Against expectations, no between-country differences in health inequalities are found. However, comparing results for mothers with those for all working-age women reveals that the easing of mothers’ health inequalities maps partially to expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Public PolicySame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207