Bibliographic record
Abstract
Andragogy and N. F. S. Grundtvig: A Critical Link[Andragogik og N. F. S. Grundtvig: en kritisk vurdering]Af Clay WarrenI udforskningen af spørgsmålet: Hvordan har N. F. S. Grundtvigs filosofi om livslang læring påvirket den amerikanske forskning i voksenuddannelse? opsummerer forfatteren de største amerikanske pædagogiske tænkeres syn på voksenuddannelse og på Grundtvigs pædagogiske filosofi. På denne baggrund kontrolleres den amerikanske andragogiske tradition for anerkendelse af Grundtvigs betydning på området, og det konkluderes, at selvom Grundtvigs levende ord har haft stor indflydelse på forskere som E. C. Lindeman, som igen har overført denne arv til efterfølgende voksenundervisere, og selvom amerikanske voksenunderviseres andragogiske grundantagelser derfor stort set afspejler Grundtvigs syn på voksenundervisning, er Grundtvigs pædagogiske forfatterskab i al væsentlighed forblevet ulæst og ukendt i Amerika.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".