MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2237585666 · doi:10.1175/jtech-d-14-00188.1

Data Assimilation for Bathymetry Estimation at a Tidal Inlet

2016· article· en· W2237585666 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Moghimi, Mihrimah Ozkan, G. Wilson, A. L. Kurapov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersInternational Association of Sedimentologists
KeywordsBathymetryData assimilationInletGeologyRemote sensingRadarSynthetic aperture radarOcean currentCurrent (fluid)MeteorologyGeodesyOceanographyComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study involved developing and testing a data assimilation framework that accommodates different types of geophysical ocean data (i.e., surface velocity and wave information) and provides an estimation of the bathymetry of a mixed-energy tidal inlet. This framework was successfully applied to a highly variable tidal environment using synthetic data (twin test). The synthetic data consisted of surface velocity components associated with the tidal circulation and wavenumber–frequency pairs of incoming surface gravity waves that mimic data that could be derived from an airborne synthetic aperture radar system and a tower-mounted X-band radar system, respectively. The present ensemble-based assimilation framework has previously been applied in both wave-dominated coastal and current-dominated riverine environments. In contrast, the inlet environment is neither wave nor current dominated. The assimilation of wave and current data together was most useful to obtain a skillful estimate of the spatial map of bathymetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologySame topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207