MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2237719956 · doi:10.5488/cmp.18.32601

Molecular theory of solvation: Methodology summary and illustrations

2015· article· en· W2237719956 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCondensed Matter Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDivision of Graduate EducationAlberta Innovates Bio SolutionsArboraNanoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorAlberta InnovatesFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversity of AlbertaWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsSolvationIntegral equationDiagrammatic reasoningClosure (psychology)Thermodynamic integrationStatistical mechanicsMolecular dynamicsDensity functional theoryField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integral equation theory of molecular liquids based on statistical mechanics is quite promising as an essential part of multiscale methodology for chemical and biomolecular nanosystems in solution. Beginning with a molecular interaction potential force field, it uses diagrammatic analysis of the solvation free energy to derive integral equations for correlation functions between molecules in solution in the statistical-mechanical ensemble. The infinite chain of coupled integral equations for many-body correlation functions is reduced to a tractable form for 2-or 3-body correlations by applying the so-called closure relations. Solving these equations produces the solvation structure with accuracy comparable to molecular simulations that have converged but has a critical advantage of readily treating the effects and processes spanning over a large space and slow time scales, by far not feasible for explicit solvent molecular simulations. One of the versions of this formalism, the threedimensional reference interaction site model (3D-RISM) integral equation complemented with the Kovalenko-Hirata (KH) closure approximation, yields the solvation structure in terms of 3D maps of correlation functions, including density distributions, of solvent interaction sites around a solute (supra)molecule with full consistent account for the effects of chemical functionalities of all species in the solution. The solvation free energy and the subsequent thermodynamics are then obtained at once as a simple integral of the 3D correlation functions by performing thermodynamic integration analytically. Analytical form of the free energy functional permits the self-consistent field coupling of 3D-RISM-KH with quantum chemistry methods in multiscale description of electronic structure in solution, the use of 3D maps of potentials of mean force as scoring functions for molecular recognition and protein-ligand binding in docking protocols for fragment based drug design, and the hybrid MD simulation running quasidynamics of biomolecules steered with 3D-RISM-KH mean solvation forces. The 3D-RISM-KH theory has been validated on both simple and complex associating liquids with different chemical functionalities in a wide range of thermodynamic conditions, at different solid-liquid interfaces, in soft matter, and various environments and confinements. The 3D-RISM-KH theory offers a "mental microscope" capable of providing an insight into structure and molecular mechanisms of formation and functioning of various chemical and biomolecular systems and nanomaterials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it