La distribución y el consumo del cine en la era digital: una mirada desde Cuba
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A traves del presente articulo se pretende realizar un analisis sobre el impacto de las Nuevas Tecnologias de la Comunicacion en esferas como la distribucion y consumo del cine en el actual contexto, a partir de la complejidad que implica el transito de la era analogica a la digital para la industria del cine, partiendo de referentes teoricos autorizados que han estudiado el fenomeno desde esta perspectiva, como el canadiense Herve Fischer y la sociologa cubana Cecilia Linares. El analisis del tema a partir de su aplicacion al contexto social cubano deviene un aporte insoslayable del articulo. Palabras clave: Distribucion, consumo audiovisual. ABSTRACT The aim of this article is to make an analysis about the impact of New Technologies of Communication in topics fields like distribution and consumption of filming products nowadays, taking as a starting point the complexity that implies the transfer from analogical to digital age for movie’s industries, taking into account authorized theory references that have studied the matter about this perspective, authors like the Canadian Herve Fischer and Cuban sociologist Cecilia Linares. The analysis of this subject represents a contribution to Cuban social context. Keywords: Distribution, audiovisual consumer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it