Estudo da influência dos perfis de solo na resposta dinâmica de sistemas rotor-fundação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste trabalho é estender e melhorar a análise dinâmica de um sistema rotorfundação-solo através da inclusão de modelos distintos de perfis de solo.Obtém-se a resposta desbalanceada de um rotor Laval (Jeffcott) simples bidimensional com mancais rígidos.O rotor é colocado sobre uma fundação de bloco rígido.Os perfis de solo incluem o modelo clássico de semi-espaço e o modelo de solo sobre base rígida.Em particular, uma camada sobre base rígida com diferentes valores de profundidade será considerada.A resposta dinâmica do solo é obtida no domínio da freqüência.O mecanismo de amortecimento interno do solo é considerado.Vários estudos paramétricos são realizados para avaliar o papel da espessura da camada do solo, do coeficiente de amortecimento do solo, da inércia da fundação e da altura dos mancais na resposta ao desbalancemento do rotor.Acredita-se que a análise deste modelo simples de rotor-fundaçãosolo ajudará a esclarecer o papel dos parâmetros mencionados na resposta dinâmica do rotor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".