MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2238134202 · doi:10.25071/0843-4182.28868

Les deux noms de F.J. Temple

2004· article· fr· W2238134202 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bernard Fournier

Bibliographic record

VenueLittéRéalité · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTempleArtHumanitiesPhilosophyHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paris" 1 J 11 ' ,uh un ,<bc, vOY'll,m/ rn" ""in" 'ont cl" ,rn,,,,,// Si I, l monde est mon ocean/ en ma terre je fais relache// Ma tete epanouit ses branches/ a mes pieds poussent des ancres// Loin je suis pres des origines/ quand je pars je ne laisse rien/ que je ne retrouve au retour l .» La double metaphore maritime et vegetale rend compte de la double postulation du poete : d'un cote la terre, « ma » terre, precise-t-il, de l'autre, la mer qui s'offre aux pieds de la ville pour l'inviter aux explorations.Relevons aussi la surprise de l'enjambement des deux derniers vers : « Quand je pars je ne laisse rien/ que je ne retrouve au retour », qui rejoint l'oxymore du vers precedent, « loin je suis pres des origines ».Par cette figure de style, le poete tente de reunir dans une meme voix les deux sources qui constituent son etre : le sol natal et ses voyages.De cette double orientation naissent deux noms donnes au poete par des « hommes-frontieres », double orientation qui situe resolument la poesie de Temple dans une aventure ontologique.Le paysage natal forme l'enfant, et la lecture 1'invite au voyage imaginaire.Les pays et les gens que le poete rencontre vont imprimer de nostalgie tous ses periples et pousser le pohe au lyrisme.Le regret d'un Passe deftni, pour reprendre un titre de Cocteau, amene le poete a se considerer luimeme, a se construire, et dans cette fuite, et dans ce retour, a travers les autres, a travers les femmes et meme jusqu'a Dieu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLittéRéalité→Same topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research→French-language works237,207→