La persistance de l’idéologie linguistique des remarqueurs dans les chroniques de langage de 1925 à nos jours
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article j'examine dans quelle mesure l'idologie linguistique des remarqueurs du XVII e sicle, et notamment celle exprime par Claude Favre de Vaugelas dans ses clbres Remarques sur la langue franoise de 1647, persiste dans les chroniques de langage publies en France ou en Belgique depuis les annes 1920. Ces courts articles sur l'usage du franais qui apparaissent dans les journaux ou revues ont jou un rle important dans la presse franaise au XX e sicle. Je fais l'analyse des chroniques de trois moments reprsentatifs dans l'histoire de ce genre : les annes 1920 et 1930 ; la priode 1950-1970, considre par certains comme l'ge d'or du genre ; et les quinze dernires annes. Je m'intresse en particulier la persistance de certaines notions cls -la puret, la nettet ou la clart, et la conception de ce qui constitue le bon usage du franais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it