COMPETITIVE STATE ANXIETY AMONG ADOLESCENT BASKETBALL PLAYERS DURING A TOURNAMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to investigate the variation in competitive state anxiety among adolescent male basketball players during a tournament. In all 113 male basketball adolescent players, who represented ten schools of Dharwad district participated in basketball tournament constituted sample for the study. Tool 'Sports Competitive State Anxiety Inventory - II' was administered to the participants for 20 minutes prior to their match. The inventory provided scores on state cognitive anxiety, state somatic anxiety and self confidence. In the first round, pre-quarter finals, of the ten-team tournament six teams were given 'bye'. Thus only four teams played the first round. In the second round, i.e. quarter finals, eight teams participated. In the third round, i.e. semifinals four teams and in the finals two teams participated. Thus the participating teams played four rounds in the tournaments. Round wise data was subjected to analysis of variance. The results indicated that there were no significant differences in the somatic anxiety and self-confidence scores from round to round, while cognitive anxiety significantly increased before the finals. The results and the implications are discussed in the article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".