Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports on a large-scale study carried out at the University of Victoria on second language vocabulary acquisition. The research investigated intentional vocabulary learning in combination with the use of information technology as suggested by Schmitt (2008). The research questions were how female and male learners used an online vocabulary program and if this was related to their learning outcome. A total of 186 first-year German as a foreign language students (104 female, 82 male) participated in the study over two semesters. The analysis showed that the male students used the program significantly less than the female students in the second semester. Although the female students slightly outperformed the male students on the vocabulary quizzes, the differences were not statistically significant. 1 Context of the study Naturally, learners have individual preferences when it comes to studying a foreign language. Researchers are interested in questions such as what motivates the learners and how they can be motivated. In her book on gender differences in language learning, Chavez (2001) describes how female and male students interact differently in the second language classroom, and how they prefer different task-types, topics and feedback. However, little is said about information technologies (IT) in this context, an area that has seen an exponential rise in the last ten years. In today’s foreign/second language classroom, software programs, online applications, or internet learner platforms are often used by instructors to enhance the learning experience. The question is, though, do they and if so, do they advantage or disadvantage female or male students? Most of the studies on motivation towards language learning, in particular, using IT in the second language classroom, have produced mixed outcomes: while some reported gender differences, others found no evidence of such differences. The study of gender differences in relation to vocabulary acquisition, in particular on intentional second language vocabulary learning facilitated by a computer program, has more or less gone unnoticed. This article therefore aims to look into this area with a study that was carried out in several sections of a beginner’s German program during one academic year at the University of Victoria in Canada. The program was specially designed so that the students could review words five times over a period of ten days and the following questions could be addressed: whether the students actually used the potential of the program, whether the female and male students used it similarly, and what impact such uses had on their learning outcome. How do Female and Male Students work with an Online Vocabulary Program? 211 1.1 Motivation and anxiety towards a foreign or second language Studies on motivation in relation to differences between female and male students in foreign or second language acquisition have produced mixed results. A large-scale survey on motivation with almost 5000 participants carried out in Hungary by Dornyei and Clement (2001) using Gardner’s socio-educational model reported that female students scored higher than male students in all aspects of motivation including integrative and instrumental factors. The target languages were English, German, French, Italian and Russian. A survey of almost 500 students carried out by Mori and Gobel (2006) in Japan in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom also used Gardner’s model, yet did not confirm these results. One explanation might be the different cultural settings of these studies, as the cultural heritage and societal norms might play a role in motivation. In her book on gender, Chavez (2001) describes how male students are often less engaged in the second language classroom. They don’t interact as much with peers as female students do and are skeptical towards feedback received from peers. However, this behavior does not necessarily affect their learning outcome. Female students, on the other hand, are more willing to communicate, in particular with native speakers, and engage in discussions. 1.2 Information technology and the second language classroom The next question is in what way female and male students handle information technology in the second language classroom and if there is a link to motivational factors. A large-scale study carried out in the United Kingdom based on 427 surveys and 85 audio logs reported that language students appreciate using Web 2.0 technology that allows them to create their own content (Conole, 2008). It was observed that language learners used this technology in a reflective, critical manner and integrated online sources with print materials. A similar result was reported by Lee (2005) in a study carried out at the University of New Hampshire surveying advanced Spanish students. Not all studies are that positive. Winke and Goertler (2008) surveyed 911 firstand second-year undergraduate French, German and Spanish language students at Michigan State University, and found that many students do not have the skills necessary to engage in the specialized nature of computer-assisted language learning tasks because these tasks are different than the everyday use of e-mail or Facebook. A study by Stracke (2007) carried out in Australia echoed these findings and added that some language students reject the computer as a medium of language learning because it is impersonal. In some cases, students showed high levels of anxiety to study in a hybrid or blended language learning context (Ushida, 2005). Ushida used Gardner’s socioeducational model of second language acquisition for her study finding that students who were motivated to engage in the online component of the course showed higher scores on tests than those who had high levels of anxiety. Interestingly, those differences were not statistically significant. Ushida also reported the biggest disadvantage of such courses was the reduced interaction between teachers and students. Not many studies have investigated gender differences regarding attitudes, motivation or performance using computers. Based on an investigation of 850 secondary school students (444 males, 406 females) in Ontario using different online learning objects covering concepts in biology, history, chemistry, general science, geography, mathematics, and physics, Kay and Knaack (2007) found no marked individual differences between female and male students. In the context of second language learning, studies of this kind are surprisingly hard to find. One explanation might be that no clear picture has emerged regarding motivation comparing female and male students so far. 1.3 Vocabulary acquisition The process of acquiring a word in a second language has been investigated by several researchers. One area of investigation is the context, in which words are acquired by. Oxford (2003) points out that one would expect that certain tasks favor certain learner types. In vocabulary learn-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".