MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2238340464 · doi:10.7340/anuac2239-625x-72

Back to the roots? Narratives of integration among Espírito-Santenses in the contemporary e/immigration to Italy

2015· article· en· W2238340464 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueANUAC. · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Racism, and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationImmigrationNarrativeQuarter (Canadian coin)Movement (music)GeographyEthnologyHistoryEconomyArchaeologyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last quarter of the nineteenth century was a large concentration of foreigners, especially Italians, to be settled in Espírito Santo. At the end of the twenty century, the movement is reversed. But who are these people from Espirito Santo departing and departed? How they live or are living in the land of their ancestors? What relations are established between the spaces of emigration and immigration? To understand these questions the aim is to identify narratives of displacement movement of the colonies of Italian immigration of the Espírito Santo to Italy, the movement of "return" of descendants to the land of their nonni and nonne. To this end, oral history interviews were conducted, focusing on trajectories of women and men who depart, trying to understand the impacts on relationships established within immigration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it