MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2238421236 · doi:10.1089/dia.2015.0347

Hypoglycemia-Induced Decrease of EEG Coherence in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

2016· article· en· W2238421236 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Rubega, Giovanni Sparacino, Anne Sophie Sejling, Claus Bogh Juhl, Claudio Cobelli

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoglycemiaDiabetes mellitusElectroencephalographyType 1 diabetesType 2 diabetesCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Continuous glucose monitoringInternal medicineCardiologyEndocrinologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemic events in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are associated with measurable electroencephalography (EEG) changes. Previous studies have, however, evaluated these changes on a single EEG channel level, whereas multivariate analysis of several EEG channels has been scarcely investigated. The aim of the present work is to use a coherence approach to quantitatively assess how hypoglycemia affects mutual connectivity of different brain areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EEG multichannel data were obtained from 19 patients with T1D (58% males; mean age, 55 ± 2.4 years; diabetes duration, 28.5 ± 2.6 years; glycated hemoglobin, 8.0 ± 0.2%) who underwent a hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp study. The information partial directed coherence (iPDC) function was computed through multivariate autoregressive models during eu- and hypoglycemia in the theta and alpha bands. RESULTS: In passing from eu- to hypoglycemia, absolute values of the iPDC function tend to decrease in both bands in all combinations of the considered channels. In particular, the scalar indicator [Formula: see text], which summarizes iPDC information, significantly decreased (P < 0.01) in 17 of 19 subjects: from T5-A1A2 to C3-A1A2 from O1-A1A2 to C4-A1A2 and from O2-A1A2 to Cz-A1A2 in the theta band and from O1-A1A2 to T4-A1A2 and from O1-A1A2 to C4-A1A2 in the alpha band. CONCLUSIONS: The coherence decrease measured by iPDC in passing from eu- to hypoglycemia is likely related to the progressive loss of cognitive function and altered cerebral activity in hypoglycemia. This result encourages further quantitative investigation of EEG changes in hypoglycemia and of how EEG acquisition and real-time processing can support hypoglycemia alert systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Technology & TherapeuticsSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207